[ Pobierz całość w formacie PDF ]
.Also, theuse of strong outposts could shift the Brussels 1987position's balance.1.d4 ��f6 2.c4 e6 3.��c3 Ah4 4.e30-0 5.Ad3 d5 6.��ge2 c5 7.cd5ed5 8.0-0 b6 9.a3 Ac3 10.��c3Ag4 ll.f3 Ae6 12.b4 cd4 13.ed4��c6 14.��e2 h6 15.Ad2 ��e7t6.b1 d7 17.b5 Af5 18.c1Spielmann makes progress in the fol�:fc8 19.'tt Ad3 20.ffd3 ��f5h3lowing game by posting his pieces better2l.Ab4 l:(e8 22.��g3 ��g3 23.hg3than his opponent, whose weaker d�ac8 24.g4 h5 25.g5 ��h7 26.g6pawn ties him down to defense.Spiel���g5 27.gf7 ��f7 28.c8 c8mann is able to combine arrack with the29.f2.l;te6 30.:h1 g6 31.e1defense of his own weak pawn.As al�g7 32.l:(e6 e6 33.c3 fff6ways, the best defense is a good offense.34.e3 ��h6 35.f1 ��5 36.e5However, in a balanced pawn structureffe5the best piece placements contribute to 37.de5both arrack and defense.(see next diagram)Mlddlegame trategy! OK37.f7 38.f2 e6 39.f4 d4 Combining defense of his weak pawns40.f3 d5 41.g4 e3 42.gh5 with an attack on Black's position.gh5 43.a4 f5 44.��e1 d3 45.a5 30.ffd1 31.Afl l:ic7 32.��c7d4 46.f2 h4 47.ab6 ab6, 0-1 ��f7 33.��ds f5 34.f6 gs35.e5, 1-0.White has the unbeat�Here is another example of attack and able threat of 36.��f6, and if 35.g7defense revolving around the mutually 36.��d8 kf8 37.��f6 wins.fixed d-pawns.Now let's look at an example where theattack and defense of the d-pawn is a(145)minor element in the position.Speelrnan,J-Maksirnenko,ACopenhagen 1996(146) Trikaliotis, G-Barry, C1.c4 e6 2.f3 d5 3.d4 c6 4.ffc2Luzem 1982f6 5.��g5 bd7 6.e3 ffa5d5 4.c31.d4 f6 2.c4 e6 3.Gtlf37.bd2 e4 8.��f4 ��e7 9.h4e7 5.f4 0-0 6.e3 c6 7.cd5d2 10.d2 dc4 11.��c4 e5ed5 8.��d3 bd7 9.ffc2 e812.��g3 ed4 13.0-0 0-0 14.ed410.h3 f8 11.g4 e6 12.e5 c8As mentioned in the isolani chapter,13.Ag3 c5 14.0-0 a6 15.a4 6d7this pawn structure could arise out of16.ad1 cd4 17.ed4 In terms ofthe Carlsbad.14.b6 15.��d3attacking and defending the d-pawn,ffh5 16.��ae1 d5 17.f3 f6White seems to be achieving a posi�18.a3 19.��c4 Ag4 20.d2tional plus.However, as with all princi�.b[d8 21.b11 Preparing to challengeples in chess, this"fu.ctor does not standthe blockading on d5.21.iU8alone on the chessboard.In the present22.c3 h8 23.d5 cd5 Now weposition White's Kingside pawn struc�have the balanced pawn structure, theture is weakened.24.Ad3 g6t,ubject of this chapter.25.a41'tt a6 26.ffa5 c8 27.c1(see next diagram).b!c1 28.c1 g7 29.��c7 Ae630.b61 ne aiancea rawn ��tructureI Utwo likely pawn structures here (bal�anced or isolani) , White would prob�ably prefer the balanced due to his weake3 pawn.So what is wrong with Black'splan in this position? 20.d3 White'sresponse even seems to encourageBlack's plan of.e6.Controlling theb4 square delays Black's idea, but even�tually White's can be exchanged forthe Black and his plan can go for�ward.20.e6 20.cd4 2l.ed4 ��d622.nes is clearly in White's favor.21.f5 Another delay for the oppo�.�� 18.Ae5 18.de5 d4.18.h5117nent.21.'�f8 22.g3 g6 23.dc519.Af5hg4 20.hg4 c6! Transfer�Now Black's game plan begins to fallring the to the Kingside is essentialapart.White still has the weak e3 pawn,to Black's attack.21.d3? 2l.��g2,but the Kingside attack is becomingwith the idea of 22.hl, would defendmore important than long term disad�the Kingside better.21.Af5 22.gf5vantages.23.c5 24.d4 e6Ah4 23.��h3 mt6 24.wh2 h725.e5 d4 26.ed4 Black has fi�25.Af4 g5 26.Ag5 fig5 27.d3nally achieved his structural goals, butAf2 28.d5 :e3, 0-1the dynamics of the position will over�whelm him.26.h5 Forced in viewIn the next game the battle of ideasof White's Kingside attack, e.g.surrounding the creation of a balanced26.��b4 27 g6!! ��d4 28.��hl wins.pawn structure is very instructive.27.f2 f6 28.e3 d7 Onmost other Black moves White would( 147) Christiansen, L-Bayer, Econtinue as in the game.29.f4 f6Porz 198830.1::I e4 31.Ae4 de4 32.f5 g5g31.c4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.c3 f6 4.cd533.g4 d6 34.d5 h5 35.e3 f6ed5 5.Ag5 c6 6.e3 Ae7 7.Ad336.h6 wfs 37.��5 fg5 3B.g5,0-0 8.'�c2 bd7 9.ge2 e81-010.0-0 f8 ll.��ae1 Ag4 12.g3h6 13.Af4 Ad6 14.Ad6 d615.f3 Ae6 16.fif2 ad8 17.ce2e7 18.Ab1 Ac8 19.f4 c5?1Bayer has a plan of attack and defenseThis chapter deals with the simplestfor the d-pawn.If White does nothingCarlsbad structure, yet here is a goodBlack will position his on e6, createplace to bring up the most complexthe balanced pawn structure and pro�point in our understanding of theceed to attack the d4 pawn (e.g.withCarlsbad.During the fight that sur�.'t'i'b4).The position would then favorrounds this pawn structure, severalBlack based on the central pawns.Bypawn structure changes must be fore�the way, if given a choice between the ofcasted when composing a planMJddlegame trategy1 1 0action.As we saw in the minority square.What pawn structures shouldattack, certain maneuvers require each side plan for? 7.c6 8.c3responses that may change the pawn d6 9.a3 The struggle surroundingstructure.However, this thinking is the isolani is equal.The contest overlimited in its view of the Carlsbad.The the d5 square offers Black a solid de�true test of the struggle lies in estab� fense and White a slight initiative.lishing a structure which either evolves 9.Ae7 to.Ad3 o-o u [ Pobierz całość w formacie PDF ]